For most of
my childhood, Saturday mornings on Timberlake Road just outside Philadelphia
meant spending time cleaning the house. I
don’t remember enjoying the cleaning part but I do remember enjoying the music
my mom played on the, “Hi-Fi” while we cleaned.
She was a 50’s and 60’s gal. Supremes,
Temptations, Buddy Holly, Martha and Vandellas, Four Tops, Frank Sinatra, Ronnettes,
Drifters, and the occasional one-hit wonder artists. One of those songs that occasionally got
stuck in my head was a 1961 hit by Barry Mann called, “Who Put the Bomp.” It included a chorus that went:
Who put the bomp in the bomp bah bomp
bah bomp?
Who put the ram in the rama lama ding
dong?
Who put the bop in the bop shoo bop
shoo bop?
Who put the dip in the dip da dip da
dip?
Who was that man? I’d like to shake his hand.
“Who Put the
Bomp” came to mind recently as I was thinking about, of all things, the concept
of, “education-based activities.” The
National Federation of High Schools and all of our individual state high school
athletic and/or activities organizations reference that phrase often. I wondered where the phrase came from. Or, as Barry Mann might ask, “Who put the
education in education-based athletics?”
And, perhaps more importantly, whose responsibility is it to keep it there?
According
the NFHS, “The term ‘education-based athletics/activities’ has been used
frequently to describe the U.S. model of incorporating sports and other
activity programs within the high school setting.” I would offer beyond that description that “education-based”
infuses the culture of the school into those programs. The focus on respect, dignity, hard work,
goal setting, improvement, positive relationships, and support for each other,
among other things is taken to the field, the court, the track, the pool, the
stage, and any other athletics/activities arena. In short, what is expected, developed,
promoted, and reinforced in the classrooms and halls is also to be expected,
developed, promoted, and reinforced in the athletic and fine arts programs. The phrase, “education-based activities” is
not to be dismissed. To dismiss it
is to dismiss the core values we hold to in our schools. To dismiss it relegates our programs to
recreational pastimes with no concern for the impact they can have on our young
people.
Which takes
us back to, “Who Put the Bomp?” The answer is a simple one – school administrators.
Administrators put the “education” in “education-based
athletics.” Those administrators saw the
benefits of such programs and considered them an important part of the overall
student experience. In 1903, the
Principals Club in Iowa formed a committee to adopt rules for high school
sports. In 1904 those rules were adopted. In that same year, Superintendents and
Principals in Iowa formed the Iowa High School Athletic Association. So, the “bomp” of education-based activities,
established by administrators, has been in place for over 100 years.
Since it was
administrators in Iowa who implemented education-based activities over 100
years ago, it stands to reason that today’s administrators are charged with
being the “keepers” of those education-based activities. And let me repeat what I stated earlier – the
phrase is not to be dismissed. While,
as administrators, we may not be directly involved in coaching or directing, we
are responsible for those programs by the leaders we place in charge of the
programs, and how we hold those leaders accountable to the core values of our
schools. Fortunately, many of our
coaches and directors understand the culture of our schools and work to ensure
that athletic and/or activities programs reflect that culture. Unfortunately, some do not. Whether it is a coach/director who teaches in
our building but leaves the school culture at the gym/locker room/theatre door,
or an out of building coach/director who may not understand the culture, they
take the “bomp” out of education-based activities and shortchange our students
in the process. As keepers of education-based
activities, what are we to do?
To ensure
that the “education” in education-based activities remains in place, it’s
important that we hold those leading our programs accountable for a consistency
that what is taught throughout the day is also taught beyond the day. For
those who teach in our schools, expectations of what is considered professionally
appropriate during school hours should be the same expectations when it comes
to before and after school activities. Consider
language. If we wouldn’t tolerate
profanity from our teachers in the classroom, why would we tolerate it from our
coaches or directors? For those who don’t
teach in our buildings, it’s important to educate them about our school culture
first and then hold them to the same standards we would hold our teaching staff.
Similarly,
our expectations of students in our activities programs (as participants or
fans/audience) must be consistent with the expectations we have for them as
students during the school day. Public behavior
is the only indication those outside our schools have about how we impact the
young people we serve. There is no more
public display than that of our activities programs. What reflection of our schools do ours convey?
At the end
of the day it’s about setting ourselves apart.
We invest a great deal of time and resources into our activities
programs. What is the return on
investment? Recreational programs have a
place in young people’s lives. Club
programs have a place in young people’s lives.
What separates education-based programs from those recreational and club
programs is their intentional connection to the culture our students
experience throughout the day in our schools.
Only when we emphasize the “education” (the “bomp” in the bomp bah bomp
bah bomp) in education-based activities will we deliver the true value of our
programs. When a student puts on the
uniform and performs in or on our facilities, let’s make sure we’ve done everything
possible to ensure they are representing the true identity of our schools. Then, as administrators, we can be the answer
to Barry Mann’s question, “Who was that man (and woman)?”
No comments:
Post a Comment